The Acer Predator Z57 is pure insanity . At 57 in with a 32:9 expression proportion and over 1,000 nits of peak brightness , it make even thebest gaming monitorsgreen with enviousness . It has the size , and it has the specs — but as ourmonitor buying guidewill order you , there ’s more to a monitor than size and spec alone .

It ’s hard not to walk away impressed when you first see the Predator Z57 , but as I ’ve lived with it for a few weeks , I ’ve uncovered some issues . The monitor delivers the tops - telling experience that 32:9 displays are know for , and with excellent image character in towage . However , there are a lot of caveats when it comes to actually using the monitor lizard Clarence Shepard Day Jr. in and mean solar day out , and they ’re significant to sing about when the display in interrogative costs $ 2,000 .

Video review

Acer Predator Z57 specs

Design

You already know the Predator Z57 is huge , but it ’s severe to magnify just how monolithic it actually is . Most monitor cheat on with their size — a 27 - inch monitor like theAlienware AW2725QFactually uses a 26.5 - inch panel — but not the Predator Z57 . It ’s cheating in the opposite focal point with a 57.1 - inch panel in a 32:9 chassis . When it ’s set up , the monitor is over 4 feet encompassing , and the monumental dual - full stop viewpoint occupies nearly 2 infantry of astuteness on your desk . If that has n’t scared you off , the monitor also press 40 Cypriot pound . It is unironically the size of a five - yr - sure-enough child .

Acer do proficient use of the space . There ’s sight of branding around the monitor , with a bombastic Predator logo on the base of the tie-up , and the name of the mark spelled out on the bottom bezel . Around the back , you also get a rectangle of RGB visible radiation where the stand connects to the monitor , and you ’re free to customize it with dissimilar colour and effects through the on - CRT screen presentation ( OSD ) . If you do n’t like the stand , you could use the VESA mount on the monitoring equipment — and that ’s the good way to go given how much desk outer space the base alone hire up . Regardless of your backing , make certain to get a ally to aid when set up the monitor ; I edit my finger’s breadth intwospots between lifting the monitor out of the box and get it on a desk .

Massive as it is , the standpoint proffer some substantial adjustments points . You get 20 degrees of list and 4.33 inch of height adjustment , along with 30 degrees of swivel in either direction . There ’s no pin here , however , which is likely a right thing . You are n’t going to be turning this monitor vertical any time presently , and a svelte tweak in the pivot man of a 57 - inch monitor can literally cause a cephalalgia .

Acer includes a cable’s length - routing epithelial duct through the back of the monitor , but it does n’t lead out the front of the stand . disregarding of how you set up the display , you ’ll belike see some dangling cables with how far away , for deterrent example , the power connective is from your showing input . Maybe Acer needed to reinforce the stand to support the monitor lizard , but a proper cable - rootle transmission channel that runs through the stand would go a long path here — as would some extra long cables , for that matter . This is a $ 2,000 monitor , after all .

Features

yield that this is a $ 2,000 monitor that sits alongside board like theSamsung Odyssey OLED G9 , you believably expect that it has feature oozing out of every corner . Unfortunately , that ’s not the case . This is just a monitor , and although Acer includes some extra kickshaw , you do n’t get a full operating system like you ’ll line up on Samsung ’s 32:9 OLED .

That can make really using the monitor a hassle pass on its monumental size . For instance , Acer let in mental picture - in - picture and motion-picture show - by - picture modes , both of which are essential for a 32:9 varan ( more on why that ’s the instance later ) . Instead of quickly accessing these features with a remote , however , you have to slowly go through the OSD , select your stimulant , and adjust where you require them to live . The feature are here , but ease up the gargantuan size of the monitoring gadget , I hoped they would be comfortable to set up and correct .

Where the Predator Z57 misses out compared to Samsung ’s Odyssey OLED G9 is the Tizen operating system that Samsung uses . With Samsung ’s monitor , you may easily pull up a pelt app on one half of the screen while bring a game on the other . Here , you need two freestanding reference for the word picture - by - picture modes . It forge very well for console gaming , though I feel myself resorting to Windows PowerToys to adjust windowpane layout if I was doing everything off of a personal computer .

The picture - by - movie mode has a big downside on the Predator Z57 , however . It locks your refresh rate to 60Hz if you use 4 K for both sources , or it limit your result to 1440p if you want a 120Hz refresh rate . In addition , you ca n’t use HDR when using the mental picture - by - word picture modality .

The Predator Z57 has an edge when it comes to loudspeaker system , however . It includes stereo speakers with entree to 10 watts of power , and they ’re surprisingly sinewy . I guess it ’s not too surprising when you believe how monumental this reminder is , but I ’m happy to see Acer at least put the extra outer space to in force use .

Ports and controls

As mentioned , you’re able to only check the Predator Z57 through the OSD . There are a net ton of monitors in 2024 that let you to curb your monitor with a keyboard and mouse , and that feels painfully missing from the Predator Z57 . You ’ll want to position it up several feet away from you throw how massive the Predator Z57 is , which means you ’ll have to angle over a lot to access your setting . And you ’ll need to access them fairly oftentimes between the mental picture - by - picture mode and intensity adjustment .

The port wine side of thing is much better , though . You get threefold HDMI 2.1 ports and a DisplayPort 1.4 connection , both of which are subject of delivering the dual 4 kelvin resolution at the maximum 120Hz refresh rate . No , there is n’t DisplayPort 2.1 here . Samsung ’s Odyssey Neo G9 comes with DisplayPort 2.1 , but it also patronage double the refresh pace at 240Hz . Even theRTX 4090doesn’t funding DisplayPort 2.1 , so the via media ca-ca sense here .

You also get a USB - nose candy remark that ’s capable of 90 Isaac Watts of power delivery , and I eff the inclusion here . With the picture - by - picture mode , you fundamentally have two fully working 4 potassium display , so it ’s not out of the question to have , for example , a laptop hooked up to the USB - C connection for study while you have background videos pulled up on your personal microcomputer . Acer even include a KVM switch for swapping your peripherals .

The Predator Z57 is a routine rambunctious if you only have one gimmick hooked up to it , but you ’re definitely set up for success if you have multiple devices you want to control . I bid accessing the painting - by - picture mode was easier , certain , but there ’s no abnegate that Acer includes all of the indispensable connections for this unique variant factor .

Image quality

This is one heck of a monitor . It ’s dual 4 K , with a resolution of 7,680 x 2,160 , and it uses a mini - go backlight with 2,304 local dimming zones . It also has a DisplayHDR 1000 certification , and Acer claims it has up to 1,000 nits of peak luminosity . Even with those lofty expectations , the Predator Z57 managed to transcend on every front .

Starting with color coverage , you ’re have 100 % of sRGB coverage basically across the board , which should n’t come as a surprisal . In the wide - gamut Graphics mode , however , you ’re also getting 97 % reporting of DCI - P3 and 93 % reporting of AdobeRGB , which is on the degree of late OLED monitors like theAsus ROG Swift PG27AQDP . reportage obviously shrinks in other picture modes , but Acer made good on its claim of covering 97 % of DCI - P3 .

Color accuracy was basically perfect out of the box when try out against sRGB . Without touching anything , I measured a color error of just 0.76 . Calibration only provide a slight bound , bringing the color erroneous belief down to 0.71 . That ’s exceptional color truth on the level of something like theAlienware 32 QD - OLED , and it ’s shocking considering the Predator Z57 is using a VA panel .

If you had any concerns about brightness , you may put them to rest . The Predator Z57 blow past the 1,000 nit that Acer claim , reaching up to 1,411 nits in HDR . It near itch 500 nit in SDR , too , which is harebrained . Using the monitor , I can severalise you that it gets uncomfortably undimmed if you want it to .

With the high stratum of local dim zona , you also get fantastic contrast . Even with the luminance cranked up , the black level was just 0.02 nits . It ’s not on-key blackened like you encounter with an OLED , but it ’s about as close as you ’re going to get . You ’re not getting a 100,000,000:1 dividing line ratio like Acer claim — based on my measuring , the maximal direct contrast is about 70,500:1 — but that difference of opinion hardly weigh when we ’re let the cat out of the bag about a screen that can get this bright .

I was floored when I took the Predator Z57 out of the box due to its massive size of it , but the image quality is what really sold me on the admonisher . It ’s unbelievably shrill , thick with contrast , and ripe with colouring . No , this is n’t what you ’ll get with a proper OLED monitor , but it ’s really tight .

Gaming and 32:9 woes

I know — who am I to complain about back on an fabulously immersive gambling monitor that comes in at $ 2,000 ? There ’s unquestionably a unique experience to using the Predator Z57 as your gaming display , and when it ’s ferment the room it should , there ’s nothing quite like it . The novelty wears off quickly , though , and for me , the massive size of the Predator Z57 becomes too much to manage once you start place it through its paces in games .

get ’s get this out of the elbow room first , though : Yes , this is one of the most engrossing gaming experiences I ’ve ever had . The 57 - inch display completely enamour your sphere of survey in a secret plan likeCyberpunk 2077,and it makes you feel like you ’ve step into another man . That really is n’t an hyperbole . In fact , I could only play games in brusque sessions due to the belligerent 1000R curve and how it fulfil my field of vision . It ’s soft to throw a word like “ immersive ” around arbitrarily , but the Predator Z57 earn it .

I would n’t want to play games like this all the time , though . For appetizer , you’re able to get some motility sickness depending on how close you sit around to the monitor . If you ’re playing a fast - paced plot likeMarvel ’s Spider - Man , the fastness lines twine around the edges of the curved display can make this weird disconnect with your brain . It ’s not VR , nowhere even close , but I was still left feeling a trivial queasy after longer play sessions .

That ’s not really my main gripe with the Predator Z57 , however . It ’s just playing game at this insane aspect ratio and with these harebrained specs . A heap of games do n’t support a 32:9 aspect ratio , and even if they do , you ’ll be snapped back to 16:9 the moment you open up a menu . In games likeElden Ringthat do n’t natively patronage aspect ratio above 16:9 , you’re able to find mods . However , in the grammatical case ofElden Ring — and I ’m sure other titles — you ’ll see objects running at a lower frame rate and being called out of the biz world outside of the normal 16:9 window .

There ’s also the resolution to struggle with . This is a dual 4 special K reminder pushing just shy of 16.6 million pixel — double the 8.3 million pixels on a 4 K monitor like theLG UltraGear Dual Mode OLED . Even with the RTX 4090 , I had to massively push down the graphics preferences in a biz likeCyberpunk 2077,and take up tools like DLSS Frame Generation to get a playable frame pace . I do n’t cogitate anyone with a midrange PC is in the mart for a $ 2,000 monitor , but I ’d take a practiced aspect at your personal computer before pick up this show . Unless you have the emollient of the crop of current - gen hardware , you ’re going to run into public presentation issue .

From a gaming stand , the strength of the Predator Z57 is n’t using it in its 32:9 fashion . you may draw it out occasionally , but the varan really glitter if you cogitate of it as two freestanding 4 special K display . You necessitate to do some tweaking with FancyZones in Microsoft PowerToys to get a layout that works well , but once you do , you may well have four or more windows on your screen at once , including a biz running at 4K. That ’s unbelievable .

cabinet gaming works well , too , assuming you ’re alright get back for the refresh rate and resolution limitation placed on the picture show - by - delineation musical mode . It still stings that feature like HDR are n’t available when using picture - by - word picture , but the experience is still solid despite that .

My personal result with the 32:9 aspect proportion are n’t a mug against the Predator Z57 . I ’m well aware of the community of ultrawide enthusiasts that swear by the aspect ratio for productiveness and gaming . However , it ’s crucial to point out the pitfalls of 32:9 compared to a traditional 16:9 display . The first impression of a display like this are often much more rosy than reality , so I ’d strongly encourage anyone concerned in picking up the Predator Z57 to find a demo unit of measurement and expend some good time with it before making a decision .

Should you buy the Acer Predator Z57?

There are only two of these 57 - column inch 32:9 monitors on the market — Acer ’s Predator Z57 and the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 . Acer come in at $ 2,000 , while Samsung charges $ 2,500 for its display , though it has a 240Hz refresh pace . Samsung also requires DisplayPort 2.1 to unlock the full refresh pace , lock out the vast majority of current - gen PCs . Still , if you ’re work to spend over $ 2,000 on a gaming monitor , you want it to last .

Acer has cope to impart this design down to a more affordable price , if you’re able to call $ 2,000 low-priced . I ’m contend to warrant that advantage when Samsung ’s admonisher is only $ 500 more — and when we ’re talking about a monitor this expensive , $ 500 really is n’t that much . It ’s not the 240Hz refresh pace alone ; it ’s that you could use up to 120Hz in picture - by - picture mode on the Samsung , whereas the Acer locks you to 60Hz . That alone nerfs one of the grown use slip for a screen this large .

The Predator Z57 may endure as a crowning achievement of how large and how bright you could go , but it ’s not the right monitoring machine for most mass . If you ’re concerned in diving into the 32:9 waters , I ’d recommend the Odyssey OLED G9 . It has a down answer , but it ’s also OLED and come in at around $ 1,300 , all while providing a very similar experience to what you get here .