I critique one of the first laptop computer go AMD ’s latest Ryzen AI 9 chipset , theAsus ProArt PX13 , and found it to be very fast for a 13 - in car . While the Ryzen AI 9 has “ AI ” right there in its name , it ’s hard to measure the chipset ’s most hyped - up feature article : its Neural Processing Unit ( NPU ) that ’s the immobile among current chipsets .
Therefore , in review the larger ProArt P16 with the same chipset and with a debauched GPU , I ’m focusing on what non - gaming 16 - inch laptop computer are most often made for : originative applications with a little gambling on the side . By these standards , the ProArt P16 is a very compelling option in the large laptop space today — although , not the absolute best .
Specs and configurations
The ProArt P16 is built around theAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370chipset and a 4K+ OLED display . With 32 GB of RAM , a 1 TB SSD , and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 GPU , it costs $ 1,900 . upgrade to the RTX 4070 cost $ 400 , while upgrading RAM to 64 gigabyte and storage to 2 TB boost the monetary value to $ 2,700 .
That ’s more expensive than theDell XPS 16‘s $ 1,500 base role model with an Intel Core Ultra 7 155H CPU , 16 GB of RAM , a 512 GB SSD , a Full HD+ IPS display , and Intel Arc graphics . But , when you derive close to equal the ProArt P16 ’s base model , the XPS 16 costs a circumstances more at $ 2,700 . And the high - closing XPS 16 is $ 3,300 for the same configuration as the ProArt 16 ’s high - end model at $ 2,700 . A more private-enterprise laptop is theLenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16that starts at $ 1,480 for a Core Ultra 7 , 16 GB of RAM , an RTX 4050 , and a 3.2 K IPS presentation . Its $ 2,100 high-pitched - end configuration nearly matches the Asus ’s base model , only with a lower - resolution 3.2 K OLED video display .
Finally , theMacBook Pro 16is considerably more expensive , take off at $ 2,499 for an M3 Pro chipset , 18 GB of RAM , a 512 GB SSD , and the received 16 - inch mini - LED display . With close to the same RAM and storage , the MacBook is $ 2,899 , so more than the ProArt P16 at $ 2,300 . At the high end with an M3 Max chipset , 128 GB of RAM , and 8 TB of storage , the MacBook costs a banging $ 7,199 .
The point in time is that the ProArt P16 is a lot of computer for less money than its chief rival , at least when similarly configure . It and the Yoga Pro 9i 16 are somewhat low-priced laptops for Divine .
Design
From the all - contraband chassis and eyelid to the keyboard nestled between two big speaker unit grilles to the large touchpad taking up all usable space on the decoration rest , the ProArt P16 resemble the MacBook Pro 16 more than any other laptop computer . It ’s not a perfect match — the MacBook is blockier and does n’t have the same angles and line as the ProArt P16 .
But it ’s obvious which laptop the ProArt P16 is trying to emulate , and that even include a coating on the black colorway to give it a sheen similar to the MacBook ’s Space Black variation . The Dell XPS 16 looks a lot more modern , especially when you spread out the eyelid , but there are similarities there , too .
They ’re very close to the same size of it in width , height , and thickness , with similar video display bezels , but the MacBook Pro 16 is well heavier and so feels a lot denser . The XPS 16 is slenderly heavyset and as clayey as the MacBook . It , too , feels more impenetrable . The ProArt P16 therefore seems a little easy to tug around , but none of these machines is highly portable . The Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 is worth mentioning here as well , and it ’s slightly larger and thicker than the ProArt P16 while being slenderly lighter than the MacBook Pro 16 and XPS 16 .
Another affair that each machine share is a lineament build . You ’re spend some serious money for each one , and so that ’s exactly what you should carry . Out of this chemical group , though , the ProArt P16 comes in last place . While its bottom lid and keyboard deck are stiff enough , the palpebra is a bit flexible . Usually , Asus laptops are among the most strong , so I found that a small disappointing . It ’s not egregiously bad or anything . It ’s just that once you handle the MacBook Pro 16 and XPS 16 in particular , the Asus sense a little flimsier .
Keyboard, touchpad, and DialPad
The ProArt P16 ’s keyboard is a lot like that of the MacBook Pro 16 and XPS 16 , a received layout without a numerical computer keyboard ( found on some declamatory car ) nestled in between magnanimous speaker grilles . It ’s a honest enough keyboard with large keycaps and sufficient spacing , as well as switches that are snappy and exact . I do like the MacBook ’s Magic Keyboard a turn better , but most users will find the Asus keyboard to be more than right enough . The XPS 16 ’s zero - lattice keyboard takes more acquiring used to . I ’d rate the Yoga Pro 9i 16 ’s keyboard as roughly equivalent to the ProArt P16 ’s .
The big auto-mechanic touchpad is just OK . Its clit clicks are positive and muted , and it ’s responsive enough . But the MacBook ’s Force Touch tactile touchpad is a great deal better , with more configurability and the ability to “ click ” anywhere on its very large open . The XPS 16 has a in force haptic touchpad that suffers a snatch from being hidden , and the Yoga Pro 9i 16 again match the ProArt 16 with its own mechanical touchpad . mark to Asus here : premium laptop deserve skillful tactual touchpads .
Where the Asus dissent most is in the DialPad that ’s fundamentally a circular indentation in the touchpad with an embed release . It works with a variety of apps to add another style to interact . I ’d say it ’s just a gimmick , except Asus includes the ProArt Creator Hub utility that enables a bunch of utilitarian functionality . Users can control the laptop ’s colors to an unusual degree , let in adjust Pantone values to extremely customizable colour performance . Other tool enable effective originative piece of work , like the Work Smart function , various performance optimization tools , and several Asus creative apps . It ’s obvious that Asus has gone to great lengths to make the ProArt P16 more than just a generic Divine ’s laptop computer .
Connectivity and webcam
The ProArt P16 has a slightly singular mix of ports . To start with , it uses USB4 as its truehearted connection as fight to Thunderbolt 4 ( hold the AMD chipset ) , which would be fine except only one of the two USB - C ports stick out the faster and more up to standard . That ’s disappointing and a little surprising — even the smaller ProArt PX13 has two USB4 ports . Otherwise , there are some bequest port and a full - size SD card reader . The MacBook Pro 16 has three Thunderbolt 4 ports and a full - size Mount Rushmore State scorecard lecturer , while the XPS 16 with the RTX 4070 has two Thunderbolt 4 ports and a microSD placard reader . The Yoga Pro 9i has similar connectivity to the ProArt P16 . Asus work up in fully up - to - date wireless connectivity .
The webcam is a 1080p version with an infrared camera for Windows 11 Hello facial recognition . The NPU supports the basic translation of Microsoft Studio Effects for AI - assisted backdrop blurring and other effects .
Performance
I reviewed the same AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 chipset in the Asus ProArt PX13 , a 13 - inch laptop computer that aims to cater excellent performance in a highly portable package . The ProArt PX13 come through in that movement , while stir the question of what Asus could do with the same chipset in a much larger bod with a lot more room for better thermal . The ProArt P16 ’s design surely qualify , with three fans , Liquid Metal , a dust filter , and a few other elements that promise faster carrying out . Of course , the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 does its part as well , with 12 cores and 24 threads running at up to 5.1GHz with a default caloric design power ( TDP ) of 28 watt and a TDP range of 15 watt to 54 Isaac Watts .
In our suite of benchmarks , the ProArt P16 does very well . It ’s free-enterprise with laptops run Intel ’s 45W Core Ultra 9 185H with 16 Congress of Racial Equality and 22 threads flow at up to the same 5.1GHz . And it ’s faster than laptop running the 28 - watt Core Ultra 7 155H with the same number of core and running at up to 4.8GHz . Those are the most pop Intel chipsets in today ’s 16 - inch laptop , and looking only at CPU - intensive benchmarks like Geekbench 6 , Handbrake , and the CPU portion of Cinebench R24 , the young AMD chipset is slenderly libertine .
Notably , the ProArt P16 scored the flying result we ’ve seen in the PCMark 10 Complete benchmark that mensurate productivity and creativity operation , at 7,757 . The next closest laptop computer was the Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 with an older Ryzen 9 8945HS poker chip at 7,623 , and nigh behind that was the ProArt PX13 at 7,540 with the same AMD chipset as the P16 . Most laptops we ’ve examine lately score between 5,500 and 7,000 on the trial . That make the ProArt P16 an incredibly fast laptop for universal uses .
The ProArt P16 makes honorable employment of its Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 , more so than the Dell XPS 16 and the Alienware m16 R2 . That demo up in the GPU portion of Cinebench R24 and the PugetBench for Premiere Pro benchmark that run in a lively version of Adobe Premiere Pro . That covering uses the GPU in Windows laptops to hie up various telecasting - editing job . Here , the Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 does well with its RTX 4060 that should be a small tiresome . Interestingly , the smaller ProArt PX13 with an RTX 4050 does very well against the ProArt P16 — I do n’t cognize if that ’s serious kudos to the PX13 or a tenuous knock against the P16 .
The Apple MacBook Pro 16 running the M3 Max chipset with 16 central processor substance and 40 GPU core is much quicker across the display board . The M3 chipsets have central processor optimizations that are even quicker at video encoding and decoding , which impacts the PugetBench bench mark . But the M3 Max GPU is still a lot quicker than the RTX 4070s in the compare group .
Ultimately , the ProArt P16 is a very libertine 16 - inch laptop that does well against its primary contest . The MacBook Pro 16 with the M3 Max chipset is considerably faster , but it ’s also a good deal more expensive ; the M3 Pro variation will be closer in both cost and performance .
Gaming performance
If you corrupt a laptop computer with an RTX 4070 , chances are you ’ll desire to run some game . The ProArt P16 uses Nvidia ’s Studio Drivers , which are optimized for creative and other applications and not so much for play , but they can be swapped out for the Game Ready drivers if desire .
I ran both the 3DMark Time Spy mental test and the in - biz benchmarks of a few titles . Across the board , the ProArt P16 did well enough to dally reasonably modern game at 1600p and gamey art . The most contemporary title might slow down a bit unless you turn the graphics down or campaign at 1080p , but overall , the ProArt P16 is a fairly strong gaming laptop .
Therefore , if you need a immobile originative machine that can occasionally play the latest game , then the ProArt P16 is a very good selection .
AI performance
As I ’ve noted in all of my late reviews of laptops blow superior AI carrying into action , it ’s pretty much impossible to pass judgment any of the various claims . As note above , the AMD chipset literally has “ AI ” in the name , and indeed , its NPU runs at a leading 50 tera operations per second ( TOPS ) . That equate to the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Arm chipset ’s 45 TOPS , Intel ’s Core Ultra at 10 peak , and the Apple M3 Neural Engine at 18 TOPS . The upcoming M4 , presently only available in the latest iPad Pro , will bring Apple ’s issue to 38 top .
But those numbers pale in compare to a discrete GPU ’s public presentation at running AI undertaking , such as the RTX 4070 that Nvidia rates at 466 top of the inning . The NPUs are think of for speeding up on - gimmick AI while using less zip . They ’re all about efficiency , not performance .
So , which laptops are faster at AI ? We just do n’t know . And we do n’t know because there are no benchmark that let us to straight — and objectively — liken them . The only matter we can say is that Intel Core Ultra laptops will likely be the slowest , AMD Ryzen AI laptop computer will be the fastest ( but not by much ) , with Apple ’s M4 and Qualcomm chipsets coming in between . And Qualcomm laptops are the only ones currently supporting Microsoft ’s Copilot+ microcomputer initiative that touts AI features , but really does n’t tender much to write home about . In fact , there are almost no current AI boast that we can orient flat to as being sped up by either an NPU , a GPU , or both .
Battery life
The ProArt P16 has a 90 James Watt - hour battery , a fast chipset , and a great power - hungry 4K+ OLED display . Few 16 - inch laptop get decent barrage life , and I was n’t really expecting much from the Asus .
As it move around out , the ProArt P16 did fairly well . It managed around 8.5 hours in our web - browsing mental test and 11 time of day in our video - looping test . That ’s rough tantamount to mediocre battery life across all the laptops we ’ve tested , and it ’s better than many 16 - inch machines . For example , the XPS 16 did much worse at just 5.5 hours in both test , and the Yoga Pro 9i 16 went for 6 hours and 9.5 hours , respectively . The MacBook Pro 16 , on the other helping hand , is one of the most efficient laptops you may grease one’s palms today at a massive 19.5 hours and 27 hours , severally .
That have the ProArt P16 a reasonably long - go Jehovah ’ workstation . It wo n’t last very long when working severely , though . For example , it shut down in just 1.5 minute when consort Cinebench 2024 ( and it slows down substantially when on battery power ) . But that ’s common across all laptops .
Display and audio
The ProArt P16 has one display option , a 4K+ ( 3840 x 2400 ) OLED display running at 60Hz . It ’s incredibly discriminating and appear spectacular out of the box , with OLED ’s common dynamic colors and inky-black black . The refresh charge per unit is a flake behind the curve , where more and more mainstream display are unravel at 120Hz .
agree to my tintometer , this is an excellent display for God Almighty . It ’s shiny enough at 359 nits , which is n’t as brilliant as some other recent displays that are closer to 400 nits or more . But it ’s still brighter than our aging baseline of 300 nits , and it will be great unless you ’re shape in bright sunlight . Its colour are incredibly wide at 100 % of sRGB , 98 % of AdobeRGB , and 100 % of DCI - P3 , which is one of the best combination of dozens I ’ve reckon . Color truth is fantabulous at a DeltaE of 1.0 ( that result and low is indistinguishable to the human eye ) . And contrast is fantastically high-pitched at 25,110:1 with near - perfect blacks .
Simply put , you ’ll know this showing . It ’s one of the best you ’ll find today on a 16 - inch Maker ’s laptop . Only gamers might be a bit thwarted with the refresh charge per unit .
Like the MacBook Pro 16 , the ProArt P16 has a six - speaker system sound system , with two tweeter and four woofers . The audio is Harmon Kardon certified and offers Dolby Atmos livelihood . Asus talks a lot about the “ 5.25X louder sound ” and “ zero twisting ” afforded by the smart amplifier . The MacBook Pro 16 has arguably the ripe audio in a laptop today , so I was hoping that Asus managed to put up something alike in a Windows laptop .
I can confidently say that the ProArt P16 ’s audio frequency gets as brassy as the MacBook ’s , and like the MacBook , it has a mountain more basso than most laptops . Mids and highs are nice and readable as well . However , when pushed to the limit point , there was considerable distorted shape — belie Asus ’s claims in this regard .
I could get free of it by turning down the volume , but then it was n’t quite as impressive . Overall , I ’d say the ProArt P16 has some of the best audio in a Windows laptop computer , but the MacBook Pro 16 keep its top spot .
A MacBook Pro rival done right
I wish the ProArt P16 , a lot . It ’s tight , reasonably well - built , and has a drop - all in gorgeous OLED show . Probably the only other Windows laptop computer I ’ve reviewed that come close is the Yoga Pro 9i 16 , and I would be hard - pressed to choose between these two given their overall value and performance . At the very least , I will say that the ProArt P16 ’s OLED display is better than the Lenovo ’s mini - LED control panel .
The MacBook Pro 16 can be configured to be a lot faster , and it ’s well work up . But you ’ll have to pass considerably more to get a better laptop than the ProArt 16 . For Windows creators , the ProArt 16 is very easy to recommend . And the new AMD Ryzen AI 9 is a very fast chipset that competes well against the effective that Intel has to offer .
