Nvidia and AMD make thebest computer graphic cardsyou can buy , but choose between them is n’t easy . Unlike previous generations , AMD and Nvidia trade blow out decimal point - for - power point in 2025 , and picking a brand to go with is n’t as soft as counting the clam in your notecase .
I ’ve reviewed every graphics card AMD and Nvidia have released this generation , comparing not only stark naked performance , but also have like DLSS and FSR , re trace functioning , and how VRAM works in modern games . After dozens of graphics card reviews , here ’s how AMD and Nvidia stack up against each other in 2025 .
Nvidia vs. AMD in 2025
Before stupefy into the details , rent ’s dress the stage for Nvidia and AMD in 2025 . Both have mature generations of artwork add-in , and I do n’t expect we ’ll see any more entries . We ’re reckon forward to the conclusion of this year and early next year for Nvidia and AMD to release their next generation of graphics board .
Nvidia has its Ada Lovelace GPUs , more commonly referred to as RTX 40 - series graphics bill of fare . There are 10 cards in total , though only eight are technically part of Nvidia ’s lineup . It sound confusing , but the list below should clear thing up .
The two miss GPUs are the RTX 4070 Ti and RTX 4080 , both of which have been replaced by a Super refresh . The RTX 4070 , the only other GPU with a Super refresh , still dwell alongside the refreshed framework . Although the RTX 4080 and RTX 4070 Ti are technically break off , you may still find some model in stemma at the time of writing .
outdoors of the Super shifting , the only other curio in Nvidia ’s lineup is the RTX 4060 Ti . Nvidia sells two variant of this GPU , one with 8 GB and the other with 16 GB . They ’re the exact same graphics identity card , just with a difference in memory capability .
AMD has a modest lineup at seven GPUs , and there are n’t any Super refreshes to contend with . Here ’s how AMD ’s RDNA 3 range looks at a glance :
In both cases , we ordered the computer graphic cards from most to least powerful — the RTX 4070 Ti is more potent than the RTX 4070 , for example . This can help you get your bearings when looking at Nvidia or AMD ’s batting order , but the comparison between the two brands is a little murky .
Below , you’re able to see a table show how the choice from AMD and Nvidia compare roughly . We ’ll get into performance and pricing later , but this shows the grating eq from both brands .
There are a couple of remaining gap in the card , so you wo n’t always have an choice to one GPU if you ’re locked on a finicky brand . Again , we range the cards here by overall power , and the gap play that . For example , the RTX 4060 Ti is more muscular than the RX 7600 XT , and the RX 7700 XT is more hefty than that .
Pricing and availability
There is n’t much sense in comparing the list prices of AMD and Nvidia ’s current GPUs . Prices have shift as the genesis has function on , putting some GPUs in more direct competition with each other . Here ’s a partitioning of what you may expect to spend on a current - gen GPU at the time of publication :
There are a couple of overall trends . If you equate this leaning of prices with the hatful of GPUs above , you ’ll see that AMD GPUs are broadly cheaper . Not only is the RX 7600 the cheapest GPU available out of the current - gen lineups , but cards like the RX 7800 XT follow in slightly cheaper than the direct contender in the anatomy of the RTX 4070 .
All but one of these GPUs are pronto useable at on-line retailers , either for list toll or below list cost . The RTX 4090 is the exception . The AI boom stimulate it to fly off the shelf , and even today , it ’s tough to determine one useable for under $ 2,000 . It’snot a keen metre to buy the RTX 4090 , and it might never be .
Even without the RTX 4090 debacle , AMD is clearly ahead on pricing . There ’s a lot of segmentation in Nvidia ’s lineup , specially between $ 400 and $ 600 . AMD has a much more concise batting order around this price , with clean steps in carrying into action between each entry . At the high - goal , Nvidia GPUs are still sitting at inclination price , mostly propped up by the Super refresh , while AMD ’s options have slowly fallen in price .
achiever : AMD
Performance
I have reviews of all of Nvidia and AMD ’s current - gen GPUs linked above . If you ’re interested in a particular carte , make trusted to read our reassessment for a full crack-up of benchmark . Here , we ’re going to attain some general notes of equivalence for the three major resolution , accounting for our full tryout cortege .
protrude with 4 chiliad , Nvidia clearly win the high remainder of performance . The RTX 4090 is right smart too knock-down of a GPU to contend with , station Nvidia far in the booster cable . Down the mess , the RTX 4080 Super win over AMD ’s direct rival , but below $ 1,000 , AMD comes out forwards . That ’s showcased by the RX 7900 XT , which is in advance of the RTX 4070 Ti Super despite being $ 100 cheaper .
That story continues at 1440p , primarily on the back of the RX 7900 GRE . It beat the RTX 4070 Super while running $ 50 cheaper , and it vastly outpaces the RTX 4070 at the same price . Similarly , the RX 7800 XT comes out slightly in the lead of the RTX 4070 despite being around $ 50 cheaper .
These tests include our full suite , which has a handful of beam - tracing titles , too . We ’ll take a closemouthed look at ray tracing in the next section , but that ’s an area where Nvidia unremarkably holds a lead . Outside of ray tracing , the direct competition from AMD mostly holds up well at the same price .
Things transfer at 1080p , which is surprising given thelukewarm receptionof cards like the RTX 4060 from Nvidia . The RX 7700 XT is a great option liken to the RTX 4060 Ti , but down lower , the RX 7600 and specially the RX 7600 XT fail to ingrain . Nvidia offers a better balance with the RTX 4060 and RTX 4060 Ti for 1080p gamers right now .
If we calculate at overall execution , AMD bear more performance for your dollar in the sugared spot between higher - end 1080p gaming and lower - end 4 KB gaming . Nvidia extradite better peak performance overall and a better value lower down the stack . However , there are many considerations alfresco of performance .
In the next two sections , we ’ll talk over ray tracing and feature support , where the scales tippytoe back in Nvidia ’s favor . For this section , AMD come through for estimable overall performance .
Ray tracing
Nvidia has been the leader inray tracingsince the introduction of RTX GPUs in 2018 , but AMD is much secretive now than it used to be . A big reason why is that we ’re get wind more games with less demanding ray tracing implementation , such asResident Evil 4,where AMD ’s GPUs go much better than they did in class past .
you’re able to see that in natural action above . In less demanding games likeReturnalandResident Evil 4,the RX 7900 GRE beats the RTX 4070 with ray tracing turned on , despite the fact that the two GPUs come in at the same cost .
There ’s a set more to this tale , however , andCyberpunk 2077provides a hint as to why . In the most demanding beam tracing games , Nvidia leads . As you’re able to see in the section above , the RX 7900 GRE is about 16 % faster than the RTX 4070 overall , which is an norm that admit these ray retrace results . Despite that monolithic lead , Nvidia still comes out ahead inCyberpunk 2077 .
If you look at the comparison between the RTX 4070 Ti Super and RX 7900 XT , you could see how Nvidia still holds the leading in ray trace . The batting order trade blows with the less demanding titles , but Nvidia holds a massive lead inCyberpunk 2077 .
AMD is competitive in some ray tracing games , but Nvidia still wins this surgical incision . You desire to see your shaft of light tracing , and that loosely number at a big operation toll . Titles likeCyberpunk 2077 , Alan Wake 2,andPortal with RTXlook unbelievable due to the composite , taxing kindling tech , and Nvidia can palm the heat of those demanding scenarios far easily .
succeeder : Nvidia
DLSS and FSR
There ’s a big trend toward features defining how good or bad a particular GPU is . We ’ve seen AMD and Nvidia both heavy adorn in software system beyond the silicon over the past few years . For AMD , it’sFidelityFX Super Resolution ( FSR ) , and for Nvidia , it’sDeep Learning Super Sampling ( DLSS ) . And there are a ton of differences between them .
Starting with AMD , FSR compromise two components . The first part is upscaling , which work with any GPU and provide a performance encouragement by rendering your secret plan at a lower resolution . A small set of games also supportFSR 3 , which adds frame generation into the mixture . This compares two frames and generates one in between to boost your frame charge per unit .
The big blessing for FSR is that it ’s brand agnostic ; it works with Nvidia , AMD , and Intel GPUs . The drawback is that it does n’t always expect the best . you may see that inHorizon Forbidden Westabove . Compared to DLSS , FSR is much soft , particularly with Aloy ’s fuzz and the flora surrounding the character .
Another drawback , at least right now , is FSR 3 frame propagation . It look great , but only a minor number of title support the characteristic . Games likeCyberpunk 2077 , Warhammer 40 K : Darktide , andRatchet and Clank Rift Apart , which have promised skeleton generation , have yet to receive an update for FSR 3 .
On Nvidia ’s close , you have DLSS . It includes three core components : Super Resolution , which is upscaling ; Ray Reconstruction , which better the quality of ray - trace issue ; and Frame Generation , which compares two frames to engender one in between . The full-grown departure between FSR and DLSS is that DLSS uses AI for all of its element and requires an RTX GPU to launch the AI model on dedicated accelerators .
you may see inHogwarts Legacyhow AI makes a dispute . On the shingles , DLSS is able-bodied to maintain much more detail than FSR . In accession , DLSS is much more unchanging . Both FSR and DLSS are subject to ghosting and flickering artifacts , but DLSS in general handle fine details well than FSR does .
DLSS Super Resolution and Ray Reconstruction work on all RTX GPUs , but Frame Generation only works on new RTX 40 - series GPUs . It bet slightly good than FSR 3 , but the two features are airless . The with child encouragement for Nvidia is that DLSS 3 is in a ton of biz , such asAlan Wake 2 , Cyberpunk 2077,andRemnant 2 .
Since the founding of DLSS , Nvidia has been one step ahead of AMD in the features department , and that remains true today . DLSS is a key cause to grease one’s palms an Nvidia GPU , and it ’s a big reasonableness why game likeAlan Wake 2andCyberpunk 2077are even potential with their demandingpath - tracingmodes .
Software and drivers
There is n’t much of a comparability between AMD and Nvidia when it add up to machine driver support . We ’ve seen issues with both when it get along to gadget driver releases in the past tense , and both are quick to solve those issues when they follow up . AMD and Nvidia also ofttimes release driver alongside novel game releases . Single out a exclusive game or exclusive - driver passing , and you ’ll retrieve a succeeder . Overall , AMD and Nvidia are evenly matched in driver caliber and financial backing .
Software is a unlike issue . Nvidia used to be in a distant 2d billet to AMD , but that all changed with the Nvidia App . Now , you have a co-ordinated app for Nvidia that encompasses not only driver , urge scope , and gameplay transcription , but also other apps like Nvidia Broadcast and ICAT .
You get your standard retinue of features , including a screenshot function , record through Nvidia Shadowplay , and instant replay . Nvidia has a few singular lineament through Freestyle , though . With an RTX GPU , you’re able to employ RTX Dynamic Vibrance and RTX HDR , both of which apply AI to heighten the facial expression of your games .
Unlike the previous version of the Nvidia App — called GeForce Experience — you do n’t postulate to create an accounting with Nvidia to access any of these features . That alone does a ton to equilibrise the scales between Nvidia and AMD with software .
AMD has Radeon Software , which come with a likewise full-bodied list of features . It has almost too many to lean . Like GeForce Experience , you may get at instant replay , screenshot and video seizure , public presentation monitoring , and graphical options for supported game . you may also stream with Radeon Software and apply an overclock to your GPU .
Radeon Software has a few extra dainty , though . Integer Scaling , for example , upscales retro game to work on innovative displays , and AMD Link allow you or your friends to join to your PC remotely on almost any twist . All of AMD ’s play features — FreeSync , Radeon Chill , and Radeon Anti - Lag , to name a few — are approachable through Radeon Software as well .
AMD had a monumental principal with Radeon Software in years by , but the novel Nvidia apps fetch Team Green up to equality . Now , it ’s knockout to go haywire with either .
victor : bind
Mobile GPUs
Along with desktop art cards , Nvidia and AMD have fluid GPUs . But you ’ll find a lot more laptop computer with Nvidia graphics card game . standardized toIntel vs. AMD , Nvidia has a much larger stake in the mobile market place , and you ’ll generally find laptop with an Nvidia artwork card and Intel processor .
It ’s hard to draw any firm conclusions about how AMD and Nvidia mobile GPUs perform compared to each other . For example , the RX 6800 M inside theAsus ROG Strix G15outperforms the RTX 3080 inside theMSI GS66 Stealth . The MSI laptop does n’t boast a fully powered RTX 3080 , though , and it does n’t have as robust a cooling solution . So , is AMD good for mobile graphics wag ? It ’s a little more complicated than raw carrying into action .
Mobile graphics card do n’t equate their desktop counterpart , and laptop interior designer are free to choose how much power the card game get . The RTX 3080 inside the MSI GS66 Stealth , for example , overstep out at 95W. The RTX 3080 inside theRazer Blade 15can draw up to 105W of office , and it unsurprisingly performs better . Add on top of that different cooling solution , and the equivalence is n’t so aboveboard .
When it come to mobile GPUs , consluting item-by-item laptop computer reviews are a must . There are utterly differences between graphics cards — the RX 6800 M will do better than the RX 6700 M , and so on . But when it follow to two corresponding computer graphic cards , the laptop conception trifle a much more meaning role in performance than if you went with an AMD or Nvidia GPU .
Keep in mind DLSS and ray trace , though . Nvidia mobile GPUs still have admittance to these feature , and our conclusions on the desktop circuit board enforce here .
Winner : Nvidia
Performance parity, feature leader (Nvidia wins)
AMD has tried to reach performance parity with Nvidia for years . And RX 7000 graphics cards hit that mark , sometimes even exceeding it . That puts the nidus on pricing and feature . For pricing , AMD graphics visiting card are sell for less than their Nvidia opposite number . Factor in ray trace and DLSS , though , and that excess price is justified .
That does n’t mean AMD is a bad option . In 2025 , AMD is a better choice than it has been in years . That ’s peculiarly true if you ’re attend to get the most overall operation for your buck , and you do n’t wish much about extra features . Those features are an of import divisor for a draw of games this year , however , and because of that , Nvidia is our winner .
Switching to an Nvidia GPU ? If you ’re unexampled to modding your PC , we ’ll show youhow to instal a nontextual matter card .
