Mark Coppock / Digital Trends
The new laptop chipsets are focused on AI , with the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite officially supporting theMicrosoft Copilot+ PCinitiative and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 having a faster neural processing unit ( NPU ) , but not yet an official Copilot+ chipset .
TheDell XPS 13 ( 9345)is a Qualcomm machine and theAsus ProArt PX13runs AMD . They ’re both very fast , although the Asus has a distinct GPU alternative , and they ’re both well - built . But the XPS 13 has longer bombardment life . Do either of them land on the list ofthe best laptopsyou can buy ?
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends
Specs and configurations
There are just two configurations of the ProArt PX13 . The lowly whole is $ 1,700 with an AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 chipset , 32 GB of RAM , a 1 TB SSD , an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 GPU , and a 13.3 - inch 3 K OLED display . For $ 2,000 , you could opt for an RTX 4060 GPU .
The XPS 13 cost less . It starts at $ 1,000 for a Qualcomm Snapdragon X elect chipset , 16 GB of RAM , a 512 GB SSD , and a 13.4 - column inch FHD+ IPS exhibit . You ’ll spend $ 1,600 for a 32 GB of RAM and a 1 TB SSD , and $ 1,960 to elevate to a 3 K OLED display .
Design
The XPS 13 part the new XPS laptop computer conception . It ’s improbably sleek on the exterior , with an all - metal chassis available in silver and black colors . Open it up , and it ’s ultramodern with an all - glass palm residuum , a hidden haptic touchpad , a zero - lattice keyboard , and a row of LED tactile sensation function keys . The ProArt PX13 hail in just pitch-black , and it ’s a lot more conventional on both the outside and the inside . Given thee herculean component inside , it has more aggressive venting and looks a lot more like a miniature play laptop .
Both laptops are very well - built . They ’re all - metal and upstanding , with the XPS 13 being just a piddling more stiff in the lid , but with both laptops hold out bending and deform in the shape and keyboard deck of cards . They both have well - designed hinge that open up the lid with one hand , and they both finger great in hand .
In terms of their keyboards , the XPS 13 has no key spatial arrangement , but orotund keycaps , and its switches are clean and snappy , though quite shallow . It ’s comfortable , once you get used to it . The ProArt PX13 ’s keyboard is more traditional , with declamatory keycaps and loads of space . Its switches are deep , but just as springy , and it ’s easier to get up to speed up with more quickly . The XPS 13 ’s hidden tactual touchpad feels better than the ProArt PX13 ’s mechanical reading — except , it ’s easy to lose lead of its edges . last , the XPS 13 ’s LED contact function keys are a misstep . They do n’t bring home the bacon any haptic feedback and so you have to look at them to activate them , and even then it ’s not obvious that you ’ve murder the right one .
Connectivity is much stronger on the ProArt PX13 . The XPS 13 has just two USB4 port , while the Asus has that many and then a brace of bequest ports as well . It also has a 3.5 mm audio recording jack and a microSD card reviewer , neither of which are available on the XPS 13 . And both have the in vogue in wireless connectivity .
Finally , both have 1080p webcams with infrared tv camera for Windows 11 Hello facial realisation . They both support the Microsoft Studio Effects software via their NPUs , which are roughly the same hurrying , but only the XPS 13 supports the enhance variation .
Performance
The ProArt PX13 uses the latest AMD chipset , the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 , with 12 processor cores , 24 threads , and 16 GPU cores . It ’s a 28 - watt part by default and can be storm from 15 watts to 54 watts bet on contour . It use a mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c effect , with the latter being just as fast , but more succinct .
The Dell XPS 13 9345 streamlet on the Qualcomm Snapdragon X elect X1E-80 - 100 chipset with 12 cores ( eight public presentation and four effective ) , with the Adreno GPU . The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has an NPU subject of up to 50 tera operations per 2nd ( TOPS ) equate to the Qualcomm chipset ’s 45 TOPS . For now , only the XPS 13 is a Microsoft CoPilot+ PC laptop and can utilize its NPUs to belt along up that enterprise ’s AI feature film .
The laptops are equally matched when running CPU - intensive tasks , and they ’re both very tight for demanding productivity work flow . The ProArt PX13 has a much debauched GPU , though , specifically the discrete Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 or the faster RTX 4060 . I tested with an entry - storey RTX 4050 , but it ’s still a pile quicker than the Adreno nontextual matter . The Asus will be quicker at game and at running originative apps that can utilize the GPU . And if you choose the RTX 4060 , it ’ll be a material lilliputian fireball .
Display
There ’s just one display option with the ProArt PX13 , a 13.3 - in 16:10 3 K ( 2880 x 1800 ) OLED instrument panel running at 60Hz . The XPS 13 has several 13.4 - column inch 16:10 options , include FHD+ ( 1920 x 1200 ) and QHD+ ( 2560 x 1600 ) in IPS and 3 K OLED . The two IPS panels flow at a faster 120Hz refresh pace .
The XPS 13 ’s IPS display test very will for the technology , and it was shiny than the ProArt PX13 ’s OLED panel . But , you ca n’t beat organic light-emitting diode ’s bright and accurate color or thick contrast with inky blacks .
you may get standardised display timber with the XPS 13 if you choose for its OLED display . But , that will come at a toll in stamp battery life sentence ( see below ) .
Portability
The XPS 13 is thin , scant , and modest than the ProArt PX13 , but the difference is n’t all that significant . Both are highly portable laptops
However , the XPS 13 , thanks to running Windows on weapon system with the Arm - based Qualcomm chipset , endure a lot longer in all but the most demanding job . It ’s much more potential to get you through a full Clarence Shepard Day Jr. and more when doing productiveness work . The XPS 13 does profit from a down in the mouth - power IPS exhibit , but it also has a importantly smaller electric battery . The Qualcomm chipset is a quite a little more efficient than the AMD chipset .
The ProArt PX13 is faster, but the XPS 13 lasts longer
The XPS 13 is a fast productiveness machine , has several compelling display options , and gets great battery lifetime . It ’s also well - built , although some of its design elements are controversial and of questionable economic value . It ’s not a cheap laptop , but it ’s less expensive than the ProArt PX13 at the low terminal .
The Asus , though , is a raft faster for gamers and Godhead with its discrete GPU options . Its one OLED display choice is excellent . And at the gamy end , it ’s around the same price as the XPS 13 . That makes it the better choice for most buyers , even if the XPS 13 remains the longer - lasting choice .
